Now, I've also, of course, having been around the world 37 times, I've run into a great deal of philosophy and so forth, but I assure you, to me, this is, whatever we're talking about here is untalkable. You can just go so far, I am dealing with absolute mystery. But, I began to try to find out some words that would seem to me to be the most effective, because I can understand that the particular shape that you and I have, is entirely to do with the biosphere, the particular one little planet we'd be on that's suitable the fact is it's the only one we know of that has any water, and we're more than 90 percent water, but we are a whole this is a sensing mechanism that can be regenerated here.

I talked to you about the telephone the other day, Joe, on the telephone, do you remember the red telephone? That we're not the telephone, but this is the sensing equipment and so forth that you are using for the communication. But, this kind of sensing equipment we have on this one little planet, there might not be another one like it, but any other kind of a planet has something else. Yet the sensing mechanism would probably be very necessary all through Universe. And, therefore, I began to see that we might very deliberately have been designed to be problem solvers. We have been given access to having a mind and discovering principles, which no other creature that we know of has the capability to deal in principle. That we are given this capability so that we really could be very important kind of local monitors in maintaining the eternally regenerative integrity of Universe.

I want to get to the nearest expression that I can of this phenomena that I speak of, this Omniscience, Omnipotence. I simply talk about it as the Great Integrity. I found it quite interesting, some of my Japanese friends said that they'd used the word Yamato, in that same way, but, some other Japanese said they don't really have quite that same meaning, but, at any rate, that's I find there are a number of generalized principles. I then have what I call you and I use the word Truth. And I see Truth as special case. This is truth, or, that was an apple. The truths are however embracing generalized principles, they tend to be very communicative, and articulate of a generalized principle. So you really feel them as principle therefore you call it the truth. So these special case experiences, or "truths" then tend to lead. You never get to any exactitude as Heisenberg makes it clear, so we simply can get a little closer to the truth, and that's so I see, there is approaching of truths, and that's why I talk about then as God being the Synergetic Integral of All Truths. And, I say, these are just words. They are so utterly inadequate, when it's more than but it is very important to use, these are clues of things that give me such deeper feeling. Tomorrow when I will be able to read these things to you, I would like to because I have written what I do when I do what I call "Praying," a great deal, and I think it would be better to wait and read what I have than to try to memorize it through or to say it to you now.

But, I just have to have you understand that in all the things I've done, absolutely nothing is compared to, absolutely the only thing that has counted all the way through is when my utterly deep feeling of God. Using the word is so inadequate. But, I feel that as I'll read to you tomorrow, a God that doesn't need any proselytizing. A God that IS God. A God that I don't have to suggest what to do to. It doesn't need information from me, It knows all about it, It knows everything. So that I don't need to have to make bargains with, I don't have to have it that way. So I don't pray to God for I feel you can only talk to God on behalf of everybody, and whatever all of my attempt to talk to God is always, I must try to think about everybody and keep thinking about everybody, I really mean everybody, and if I can get enough to thinking about that, then I can really talk about We will try to talk to God. I can only talk to God in the terms of everybody.

Now, I have had experiences as I have gone along that really make me feel that God is interested in what I'm doing. I assure you. This has been this gets to be really quite difficult matter to talk about, because again it gets to be much too sensitive, because I don't think it needs you shouldn't talk very much about it. But I certainly have the big show, everything, is God. Everything . And I feel that the, when I get to I have to, I try then to describe phenomena LOVE, somebody asked about that by love I mean omni-inclusive, exclusively considerate, so I said at the finest and the largest, It is the whole, It is utterly embracing. It doesn't have any exceptions It just loves. In my lifetime as humanity has been going through the things it has been going through, it has not seemed wise to try to talk about these things. I think lots of people call me a "mechanic" a "technocrat" and things like that because I don't talk about the things that really count the most that way. Because I am not here to proselytize. Let me say, I feel God is so great, absolutely, I don't have to do any promotion of God. God can't be promoted. God is God. Everything. Utterly powerful. So I don't see it in the terms of a God who would have a special people or anything chosen, it has to be God.

Well, I think the things that I will give you to read tomorrow, or I'll read it out loud, and some of it has been published and I can tell you where you can find it.

For instance, in INTUITION , the book, INTUITION, in the back I have this Lord's Prayer. It is something I rewrite, and I rewrite, and I rewrite, as I rethink it and then after awhile I find my thinkings evolute to a point where I suddenly feel a compulsion, I'd better write that out the way I'm saying it now. It's something you think through, always. You don't do any recitations of words, you don't get into any postures, it must be this absolute live thinking. Your absolutely best thinking. To communicate. Anyway.

At the, I think the first or the second session I had with you, I said something as I was going along, this is something I have to, this is a discipline I am giving myself to. At the moment I seem to be going away from that subject, but I'm not really so, but the things that I have felt were, so and so and so and so, and I've thought it for a long time, I'm used to saying something, but suddenly I've found that that's not so that way. And, I find myself on stage saying something and having to say, "I take that back," that's not the way it is, I've learned better. I've had to correct myself publicly many times. On occasion of doing this, at the second, there's something I've said, in a sense it was not important, but I realized something I'd said was exaggerated, was not that way, but I had already gone by, and I didn't want to stop my discourse to talk about it. I should have usually. At the end of that evening I feel very bad because I hadn't stopped and corrected myself in your presence, but I felt I must not come to the end of this session, without telling you that there was something that I said to you, that was not really that way, that I really knew better, but in momentum, conditioned reflex, I said it that way. And this is something that I have to really be sure to let people know that that's the way I deal, so if I want to just tell you that I did have such an item, it really is not a flaw in the information, if really you went back and found out what it was, as I remember it, it doesn't really change the arguments any kind of way, except just the wrong magnitude, but, it's not important I could not finish without telling you, as I have it is a requirement of mine that I must tell you that I've said something that I knew at the second that it was not that way, but I didn't stop myself to correct it at that time, which bothered me, and that's what I'm talking about. That I didn't discipline myself to stop at that moment, and correct it at that moment. That I let anything stay in this meeting of ours in any kind of a flaw to me was very, very bad. But I'm confident, by saying what I'm saying, the flaw is limited because the information was not one that was going to tip you or get you wrong angles on anything.

I think that this, because I don't know quite what more to say without I would like to read the things to you that I have, and I did put them in a folio to take, and I left them in the office instead of bringing them over here by chance I'm sorry. I was going to talk to read it tonight, but we will do that tomorrow, because we're going to have quite a long time. There is a lot of time for questions, and I think that as you ask me questions we are going to do enormous amount of cross referencing all the experiences we have been having here together. I am content that I have confronted you with much that I find myself confronted with in life, that I it would take a whole lifetime to tell you all the details obviously, because that's how long it took a lifetime. But, I think I've given you highlights, and particularly, the cull the principles I've culled out what I find to be what seemed to be the operative significants in a big way, I would like it very much if you would try to read this thing before you come meet with me tomorrow. I would like to hear expression from you as to whether you feel that I know it is tough reading, but you have begun to know me pretty well, during my experience of producing the SYNERGETICS book which, incidentally, I understand a copy has arrived in New York today, from the press, the actual book, and I may get a copy over the weekend. But they're that's almost a half century of work in there. That is there, and we know there are many flaws, and we know many ways, we have already written Sonny more than 100 pages more of a second edition, haven't we? But doing this together with Sonny Applewhite, sitting in the back there, this wonderful night and incidentally he has made intimate notes by minute, about everything that I have said in this session so that if anytime we want to go back, I can really find anything, he's got these beautiful notes made.

Sonny all through my developing of this book, first place said, I will never write anything for you Bucky, but I am going to continue to confront you with yourself. And he would say, "In such a major work you are going to have to have definitions and words, very extraordinary clean meanings for words that you use, and you're coming into that world of science where they're using the word "particle" and they don't mean "particle," and we mustn't be guilty of that. And if there are no straight lines, what do you say? Now, we have developed a language in that book, and I think you'll probably find it at least interesting, having had the experience you have had with me. You may really find it quite satisfactory. But in this piece that I have given you, the Complexion, l975, you will be experiencing a lot of the consequence of my really staying in terribly tight on words and not allowing myself the use of any word that I don't have a really clear, experiential reference meaning for.

Well, let us say Goodnight. And I feel a little bit soft here, because what we're talking about is so untalkable. But I, I just, I don't believe, I'm just overwhelmed by God.